Yard Management solutions won’t fix systemic yard problems. Without operational maturity, even the best tech can fail.

As we explored in our earlier article, Enterprise Yard Operations as a Strategy for Food Shippers, food and beverage logistics leaders are increasingly rethinking enterprise yard operations, not just as a cost center, but as a strategic node in the supply chain.

The truth is that, with good reason, many companies have turned to YMS platforms and IoT devices to regain control of the yard. While these tools promise visibility and optimization, they often fall short of delivering ROI when deployed without the right people, processes, and accountability structures in place.

Approaching the transformation of trailer yards in supply chains with a technology-only mindset is, much like broader digital transformations in logistics, a recipe for failure. As the research firm Gartner has highlighted, a significant percentage of digital logistics transformations have fallen short of their objectives precisely because of an overemphasis on technological solutions without adequately addressing the crucial elements of people and processes. The complex, chaotic nature of trailer yards, with their inherent challenges of congestion, communication breakdowns, and manual inefficiencies, demands more than just a new Yard Management System (YMS).

To truly revolutionize yard operations, shippers must adopt a holistic approach that equally prioritizes technology, the people who interact with it, and the processes that govern its use, along with the physical assets involved. Neglecting to train drivers, engage yard personnel, streamline workflows, or optimize the layout of the yard itself will inevitably lead to underutilized technology, employee resistance, and ultimately, a failure to transform the yard into the agile, efficient hub it needs to be.

We will explore some of the main reasons behind that and what to do about it in this article.

The Normalization of Underperformance

For years, enterprise shippers have outsourced their yard operations, including spotting, shuttling, and gate services, under the assumption that mediocre performance was simply part of the tradeoff. Over time, that mindset has allowed serious inefficiencies to take root:

• Inconsistent execution
• Underutilized equipment
• Frequent safety incidents
• Lack of accountability and control

When problems arise, many providers either deflect responsibility or default to brute-force fixes: more labor, more equipment, more cost without addressing root causes. Across the industry, operational leaders consistently report the same challenges:

• Labor shortages and high turnover
• Unaccountable or underperforming vendors
• Safety issues that go unresolved
• Limited visibility into day-to-day operations
• No network-wide insights or standards

To address some of these pain points, organizations have turned to yard management technology in hopes of gaining control. While the intent is right, results often fall short, especially when technology is implemented in isolation and without understanding of the foundational challenges.

The Allure and Illusion of the Point Solution

YMS platforms offer powerful benefits, including real-time trailer visibility, improved gate throughput, automated check-ins, digital yard maps, and labor coordination tools. On paper, they appear to be a silver bullet for the chaos that often characterizes yard operations.

But here’s the catch: a YMS is only as effective as the operational foundation it supports. When deployed in silos, without reliable equipment, trained collaborators, clear processes, or a broader operational strategy, these tools fall short. Instead of solving problems, they become another layer of complexity. Worse, they can create a false sense of control, masking unresolved safety risks and emissions inefficiencies.

I learned this lesson early on in my career when I was trained by GE in Six Sigma. According to the Six Sigma principle, implementing technology without a thorough re-evaluation and optimization of the underlying processes is a recipe for failure and can lead to various negative consequences. Six Sigma, a data-driven methodology, focuses on reducing defects and minimizing variability, inherently emphasizing that "no matter how hard people work, they cannot exceed the capability of a process as it has been designed".

What’s Actually Holding Back ROI?

Based on insights across dozens of enterprise yards, four consistent barriers emerge:

Most YMS rollouts are layered onto third-party vendors that have limited incentive or capability to change how they operate. The result? The tech is in place, but behavior hasn’t changed. Trailers are still misplaced. Dwell time persists. Safety issues go unaddressed. And this doesn’t just affect the yard but also the warehouse, decreasing the efficiency of resources such as labor, dock doors and forklifts.

And in yards where diesel trucks idle for hours or equipment is inconsistently maintained, the absence of sustainability practices continues to burn fuel, increase emissions, and waste resources, regardless of what the dashboard says.

Technology can’t succeed without structure. Many yards lack defined Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), role clarity, or accountability. A YMS might assign a trailer move, but if the driver isn’t trained, doesn’t trust the system, or isn’t held to performance metrics, nothing happens.

This lack of process discipline also leads to unsafe conditions, especially in high-traffic yards where poor visibility, inconsistent training, or unclear protocols put people, product, and equipment at risk.

Even when data is captured, it’s often isolated. YMS data that isn’t integrated with the TMS, WMS, or appointment scheduling systems creates siloed decision-making. And when information is based on outdated trailer tags or manual inputs, it adds noise instead of clarity.

Without integrated, real-time data, it’s nearly impossible to optimize fuel usage, identify idle trailers, or measure sustainability KPIs like gate-to-dock cycle time and carbon emissions.

Too often, YMS success is measured solely by labor and cost metrics. But the hidden ROI lies in risk reduction and emissions control.

If inspections are manual, alerts go unchecked, and diesel yard trucks burn thousands of gallons annually, your YMS isn’t improving operations, it’s just digitizing inefficiency.

Operational Maturity > Software Features

Real yard optimization doesn’t start with software. It begins with a holistic operating model, where people, processes, equipment, safety, sustainability, and technology are integrated to drive outcomes.

This is the philosophy behind the Yard Operating System (YOS) approach, where technology is embedded within a broader framework, not bolted on as a band-aid. In this model:

• Team members are trained and empowered
• Continuous improvement is part of the culture
• SOPs are standardized across all sites
• Equipment is maintained and purpose-fit
• Safety protocols are enforced and auditable
• Emissions, fuel use, and dwell time are actively managed
• Data is clean, trusted, and integrated
• Technology enables—not replaces—disciplined execution
• The network operates as a unified system

When operations are stable, tech can scale results. But trying to automate chaos leads to expensive disappointment, and often dangerous, unsustainable outcomes.

How to Course-Correct

If your YMS hasn’t delivered measurable ROI, it’s not too late to recalibrate. Start by asking:

• Is our YMS embedded into day-to-day workflows or sitting unused?
• Do we have the right partner, workforce, and equipment to run efficiently?
• Are our processes standardized and enforced across all shifts and sites?
• Is the data we collect accurate, timely, and integrated across systems?
• Are we treating the yard as a strategic function or just a cost center?
• Are we actively mitigating safety risks in real time?
• Is our yard operation aligned with our sustainability goals—or working against them?

Yard Management Systems Are Just A Piece Of The Puzzle

Technology can be a catalyst; it amplifies what’s already there, good or bad. If your yard operations lack an operating system or operational framework, a YMS alone won’t solve the problem. It might even give you a narrow, false sense of control.

YMS should be viewed as a component of a yard operating system and execution model. When integrated into the broader strategy, your yard software can become what it was meant to be: a multiplier for performance and cost savings.

For more information, visit the YMX Logistics website.

Like this kind of content? Subscribe to our "Food For Thought" eNewsletter!

Now more than ever, professionals consume info on the go. Distributed twice monthly, our "Food For Thought" e-newsletter allows readers to stay informed about timely and relevant industry topics and FSA news whether they're in the office or on the road. Topics range from capacity, rates and supply chain disruption to multimodal transportation strategy, leveraging technology, and talent management and retention. Learn More